Wednesday, Apr 16, 2025 // (IG): BB // GITHUB // SN R&D
Psychological Analysis of Chinese Defense Ministry Rhetoric: “Smearing China Cannot Help Remove U.S. Label as Empire of Hacking”
NOTE:
There is a growing body of speculation within Western intelligence circles that Edward Snowden’s disclosures may have had deeper geopolitical roots than previously acknowledged—potentially involving early contact with Chinese intelligence while he was still stationed in Hawaii. Although no definitive public evidence confirms this, some analysts believe that Snowden may have been approached by operatives linked to the Ministry of State Security (MSS) or affiliated influence networks before his flight to Hong Kong in 2013. This theory suggests that his decision to leak classified materials and seek refuge in a Chinese jurisdiction may not have been purely ideological, but at least partially shaped or supported by Chinese strategic interests. If true, it reframes the Snowden affair not just as a whistleblower-driven event, but as a possible case of state-enabled insider exfiltration. China’s continued and selective reuse of the Snowden leaks—particularly in diplomatic and cyber policy disputes—bolsters this narrative, allowing Beijing to undermine U.S. credibility while deflecting attention from its own cyber operations. The subsequent MSS debriefing in Hong Kong further suggests that China viewed Snowden not just as a propaganda tool, but as an intelligence asset whose disclosures offered operational advantages and enduring value in information warfare.
Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF): On April 16, 2025, China's Ministry of National Defense strongly rebutted the U.S. Annual Threat Assessment, calling the U.S. the true “empire of hacking.” Spokesperson Zhang Xiaogang accused the U.S. of hypocrisy and cyber aggression, referencing past surveillance programs and cyber incidents to deflect blame. The statement exemplifies psychological and strategic communication aimed at shaping domestic and international narratives.
Analyst Comments: This rhetoric reflects China’s deliberate use of psychological framing to maintain internal legitimacy and discredit Western narratives. It demonstrates how state actors strategically deploy projection and identity-based framing to manage reputational risk amid global cyber tensions. The timing—immediately following the U.S. intelligence assessment—suggests a calibrated move to dominate the narrative space. Expect continued use of emotionally charged, state-sanctioned messaging as digital and ideological battles escalate.
FROM THE MEDIA: Chinese Ministry of National Defense spokesperson Zhang Xiaogang criticized the U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence’s 2025 Annual Threat Assessment. Responding to allegations of Chinese cyber aggression, Zhang accused the U.S. of being the leading global cyber threat. He cited examples like WikiLeaks, the Snowden revelations, and NSA programs such as Stellar Wind to reinforce China’s claims. Zhang warned the U.S. against launching cyberattacks and urged it to “restore a clean and secure cyberspace.” His comments were amplified across Chinese state media platforms, forming part of a broader counter-narrative to U.S. cyber threat reports.
READ THE STORY: CGTN
Trump Threatens Tariffs on Critical Minerals, Raising Stakes in U.S.-China Trade War
Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF): President Donald Trump has signed an executive order initiating a probe into the U.S. reliance on foreign critical minerals, signaling the potential for new tariffs targeting imports dominated by China. The investigation, launched under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, could escalate tensions in a high-stakes geopolitical trade conflict and impact sectors ranging from defense to green energy.
Analyst Comments: Trump’s latest move opens a new front in the economic standoff with China, one that directly targets the materials underpinning global defense, tech, and clean energy supply chains. While the order frames the initiative as a national security imperative, it risks exacerbating existing vulnerabilities in U.S. industry, given the lack of a robust domestic supply chain. If tariffs materialize, they could not only strain trans-Pacific relations but also disrupt U.S. manufacturers and deepen supply shortages, particularly in sectors like electric vehicles, semiconductors, and aerospace. China's retaliatory export bans make clear that both sides are prepared to leverage mineral dominance for strategic advantage.
FROM THE MEDIA: On Tuesday, President Trump signed an executive order directing the U.S. Department of Commerce to examine the national security risks posed by America's reliance on foreign critical minerals. The directive highlights concerns that this dependency could jeopardize U.S. infrastructure, defense systems, and technological innovation. The order invokes Section 232, a trade authority Trump has previously used to justify tariffs on steel, aluminum, and autos. The review could lead to tariffs replacing existing “reciprocal” trade measures. The move follows recent Chinese actions restricting exports of key rare earths and processing technologies, steps widely seen as retaliation for U.S. tech export controls. The White House also confirmed it is drafting an order to enable stockpiling of seabed metals to counter Beijing’s supply chain dominance. As the U.S. attempts to bolster domestic production, sectors from EVs to aerospace brace for potential cost and supply shocks.
READ THE STORY: FT
Trade War with China Raises U.S. Cybersecurity Stakes Amid Infrastructure Espionage Fears
Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF): Rising tensions in the U.S.-China trade war have heightened concerns among U.S. cybersecurity leaders about possible retaliatory cyber operations targeting critical infrastructure. Security experts warn that Beijing may leverage its advanced cyber capabilities to infiltrate U.S. systems, gather intelligence on economic strategies, and possibly disrupt essential services if economic hostilities continue to escalate.
Analyst Comments: The cyber dimension of the U.S.-China trade conflict is emerging as a key front in the broader geopolitical struggle. China's pre-existing foothold in U.S. infrastructure, coupled with their advanced offensive cyber capabilities, makes retaliatory action through digital means a highly plausible scenario. While a full-scale, disruptive attack remains unlikely due to mutual deterrence, espionage campaigns aimed at economic and policy intelligence are almost certain to increase. Additionally, rushed shifts in global supply chains due to tariffs could create exploitable cyber gaps, particularly as businesses bypass standard security vetting under urgency.
FROM THE MEDIA: A December 2024 meeting reportedly saw Chinese officials tacitly acknowledge past cyberattacks on U.S. infrastructure. While Beijing continues to deny involvement, U.S. security leaders assert that Chinese threat actors are prepositioned across key American sectors, including telecommunications, water systems, and transport hubs. Former CISA director Jen Easterly characterized China’s cyber threat as “the most serious and immediate” facing the nation. Meanwhile, experts from NetRise, Recorded Future, and West Monroe warn that the economic pressures are accelerating supply chain decisions, often at the expense of proper cyber risk assessments—an opening for threat actors. Although few believe China will risk outright infrastructure sabotage, the threat of increased cyberespionage is being taken seriously across both government and industry sectors.
READ THE STORY: WSJ
4chan Breached: Source Code, Moderator Info, and IPs Allegedly Leaked by Rival Forum
Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF): 4chan, the infamous anonymous imageboard, suffered a significant cyberattack on April 14, 2025, allegedly orchestrated by rival site "Soyjack Party." The breach reportedly exposed 4chan’s full source code, moderator identities, user IP addresses, and internal data. If verified, this incident presents real-world risks for users and staff due to the controversial nature of the platform’s content.
Analyst Comments: A breach like this illustrates the growing threat of inter-forum cyber warfare, where rival communities with ideological or cultural grudges turn to full-scale cyber intrusions. Leaking sensitive moderator and user data could have serious physical and legal implications for individuals associated with the platform. Furthermore, the use of outdated PHP and deprecated MySQL functions underscores long-standing concerns over 4chan's cybersecurity posture. If the leaked source code and user data are authentic, this breach could serve as a case study in why even fringe platforms need enterprise-grade security.
FROM THE MEDIA: Shortly after, a splinter community called "Soyjack Party" claimed responsibility for a massive breach, posting leaked content on their own site. The compromised data reportedly includes 4chan’s source code, internal moderation tools, moderator ("janitor") identities, and user IP logs. The attackers allegedly reinstated a previously banned board and exploited what appears to be a nearly decade-old version of PHP vulnerable to SQL injection. The hack has reignited speculation about 4chan’s potential links to federal surveillance, and the leak of [.edu] and [.gov] email addresses tied to moderation roles could have broader implications. While 4chan has since returned online, the site is operating slowly and has not yet publicly confirmed the extent of the breach.
READ THE STORY: The Register
Nvidia’s U.S. Manufacturing Push Follows Trump Tariff Pressure, Echoes Apple’s Onshoring Playbook
Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF): Nvidia has announced plans to manufacture AI supercomputers in Texas in partnership with Taiwanese firms Foxconn and Wistron, aligning itself with President Trump’s push to repatriate high-tech manufacturing. The move comes just one day after Trump’s administration announced new sector-specific tariff threats on electronics and semiconductor-related imports. While the full scope of domestic production remains unclear, the announcement mirrors Apple’s own recent $500 billion U.S. investment plan and signals a broader pattern of preemptive corporate alignment with White House trade strategy.
Analyst Comments: While actual volumes of domestic production have yet to be disclosed, the optics of announcing “Made in America” investments are aimed at defusing regulatory pressure and gaining favor with the Trump administration. Trump’s playbook of trade brinkmanship—alternating between exemptions and tariff threats—has forced companies like Nvidia and Apple into public commitments to U.S. job creation, even if production scales remain limited. As semiconductors become more entangled in U.S.-China trade and national security concerns, similar announcements from chipmakers and AI firms are likely in the coming months, especially as the White House continues to tie tariff relief to domestic investment promises.
FROM THE MEDIA: Though analysts say the announcement wasn’t entirely unexpected, the timing and the $500 billion investment figure closely echo Apple’s February pledge to expand its U.S. presence. Nvidia will partner with Foxconn and Wistron, both Taiwanese firms, to assemble its advanced AI gear. The move adds Nvidia to a growing list of tech companies trying to align with Trump’s demand for U.S.-based manufacturing amid his administration’s volatile trade policies. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang was present at a private Mar-a-Lago dinner with Trump earlier this month. Trump touted Nvidia’s investment as validation of his high-tariff strategy, stating, “The higher the tariff, the faster they come.” Meanwhile, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick clarified that recent electronics tariff exemptions, including for iPhones and laptops, are temporary and subject to change. Nvidia’s Texas facilities are expected to begin scaling production within 12–15 months, complementing its advanced chip production partnership with TSMC in Arizona.
READ THE STORY: WSJ
Chinese Android Phones Ship with Fake WhatsApp and Telegram Apps to Steal Cryptocurrency
Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF): Low-cost Android phones manufactured in China have been discovered with pre-installed trojanized versions of WhatsApp and Telegram designed to steal cryptocurrency from unsuspecting users. According to Russian cybersecurity firm Doctor Web, these counterfeit apps are embedded directly into the device firmware via supply chain compromise, with malware targeting wallet addresses and mnemonic phrases to reroute crypto transactions to attacker-controlled wallets.
Analyst Comments: This supply chain attack marks a dangerous escalation in mobile threats, especially targeting crypto users in regions where low-end Android devices are popular. By injecting malware like “Shibai” into messaging apps at the firmware level, attackers effectively bypass Google Play protections and ensure deep persistence on affected devices. The attackers' use of sophisticated wallet address replacement—combined with data harvesting capabilities—suggests a financially motivated operation with broader espionage potential. The integration of open-source tools like LSPatch and the scope of infrastructure (60+ C2 servers, 30+ domains) also implies an advanced, possibly state-tolerated group. Regulatory scrutiny over budget phone imports is likely to intensify as similar incidents raise supply chain integrity concerns globally.
FROM THE MEDIA: At least four models under the brand SHOWJI are affected. The malware, dubbed Shibai, is injected using the LSPatch open-source tool and allows for cryptocurrency wallet address substitution during chat communication, effectively redirecting transactions to attacker-owned addresses. Doctor Web found that the malware also harvests images and chat content in search of mnemonic wallet recovery phrases. Infected phones spoof hardware specifications and Android versions to mislead users. Over two dozen attacker-controlled wallets have received over $1.6 million in funds. The attackers are also operating a large infrastructure of domains and C2 servers, and no clear attribution has yet been established. This campaign runs parallel to other emerging threats like the Gorilla Android malware and FakeApp campaigns observed on the Google Play Store.
READ THE STORY: THN
UK Scrambles to Rein in Chinese Influence Across Critical Infrastructure Amid British Steel Sabotage Fears
Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF): The UK government has initiated emergency legislation to seize control of British Steel after suspicions that its Chinese owner, Jingye Group, attempted to shut down blast furnaces at the Scunthorpe plant. This event has renewed scrutiny of Chinese investments in the UK’s critical infrastructure—spanning energy, transportation, telecommunications, and education—amid growing concerns over national security and economic sovereignty.
Analyst Comments: The attempted deactivation of British Steel’s core assets by a foreign state-linked owner has triggered one of the UK’s most aggressive interventions in industrial policy in recent memory. While China’s presence in UK infrastructure is not new, this episode may serve as a tipping point, accelerating policy efforts to unwind Chinese stakes in sensitive sectors. With China still holding significant influence over nuclear power projects, utilities, and even university research funding, the UK faces a complex balancing act between securing critical assets and avoiding destabilizing economic retaliation. This moment is emblematic of a broader geopolitical recalibration, with Western democracies rethinking the long-term costs of economic entanglement with authoritarian states.
FROM THE MEDIA: The move follows allegations that Jingye, the Chinese owner of the company, was preparing to shut down blast furnaces at its Scunthorpe facility—an act officials believe may constitute industrial sabotage. British Steel is just one node in a larger web of Chinese investments in the UK. China General Nuclear (CGN), once a major stakeholder in the Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C nuclear power projects, has faced forced divestment amid espionage concerns. The China Investment Corporation (CIC), a state-owned fund, still owns stakes in Heathrow Airport, National Grid’s gas network, and Thames Water. MI5 is now reviewing Chinese involvement in the UK’s broader energy infrastructure. Meanwhile, universities like Oxford and Cambridge have accepted tens of millions of pounds from Chinese sources, including Huawei. In real estate, Chinese entities control more than 250 UK properties, including key logistics hubs. The UK’s phased ban on Huawei in 5G infrastructure is emblematic of a growing shift toward decoupling, now spreading across multiple sectors.
READ THE STORY: Independent
German Economic Sentiment Plummets Amid Trump’s Tariff Turbulence
Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF): Germany’s ZEW Indicator of Economic Sentiment plunged 65.6 points in April to -14.0, its sharpest drop since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The collapse comes in direct response to U.S. President Donald Trump’s sudden imposition of tariffs on European goods, including a 25% levy on German steel, aluminum, and auto exports, fueling uncertainty across Europe’s largest economy.
Analyst Comments: The dramatic reversal in German economic sentiment highlights the sensitivity of European markets to U.S. trade volatility. Trump’s rapid-fire changes—initially imposing 20% tariffs on EU goods, then scaling them back to 10% within a week—have undercut investor confidence and clouded export prospects for key German industries. Germany’s dependence on auto and manufacturing exports makes it particularly vulnerable to such shocks. Analysts are especially rattled not just by the tariffs themselves, but by the unpredictability of U.S. trade policy, which now poses a structural risk to the EU's industrial core. This sentiment downturn could also pressure the European Central Bank and Berlin policymakers to reassess growth projections for 2025.
FROM THE MEDIA: The dive came shortly after President Trump’s announcement of sweeping tariffs on EU imports, which initially included a 20% levy on all goods but were later reduced to 10%. Nonetheless, Germany still faces 25% tariffs on its critical exports of steel, aluminum, and automobiles, which impact flagship companies such as Volkswagen, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz. ZEW President Achim Wambach said the sentiment drop reflects not only fears over trade disruptions but the destabilizing effect of Trump’s erratic policy shifts. Financial analysts surveyed between April 7 and 14 registered the strongest pessimism in three years, signaling broader concerns over global trade fragmentation.
READ THE STORY: WSJ
India Offers Cheap Loans to Displace Russia as Key Arms Supplier
Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF): India is ramping up its push into the global arms market by offering low-cost, long-term loans to politically risky buyers and expanding its diplomatic network of defense attachés to facilitate arms deals. This strategic export initiative—backed by EXIM Bank—aims to undercut Russian defense dominance in Africa, Southeast Asia, and South America, and comes amid shifting global alliances and growing demand for alternative arms suppliers following Russia’s war in Ukraine.
Analyst Comments: With Western and Russian manufacturers diverted or constrained, India is leveraging its lower production costs, diverse sourcing experience, and EXIM-backed financing to fill a growing gap in the arms market. Targeting traditional Russian clients—many of whom still use Soviet-standard equipment—gives India a tactical edge. However, challenges remain: Indian-made higher-end systems still lack global combat credibility and suffer from limited deployment history. That said, early gains in Armenia and strong interest in Akash missiles and warships from Brazil indicate that India’s “strategic autonomy” doctrine is evolving into a viable export strategy with geopolitical implications for arms diplomacy and non-aligned countries seeking alternatives to NATO or CSTO equipment.
FROM THE MEDIA: Under Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s push to make India a global arms supplier, Delhi is doubling defense attachés in embassies across Africa, South America, and Southeast Asia, with 20 new postings by 2026. The government is particularly courting nations like Algeria, Brazil, and Armenia—countries once reliant on Soviet or Russian defense equipment. India’s $14.8 billion defense production in FY2023-24 reflects a 62% increase since 2020, but it still missed its $3.5 billion export target by a third. Nonetheless, countries are showing interest: India is negotiating missile and warship sales to Brazil, and companies like SMPP and Bharat Electronics are expanding production of 155 mm artillery shells and Akash missile systems. Armenia, once fully dependent on Moscow, now sources nearly half of its arms imports from India. India’s defense diplomacy includes not only export deals but also technical cooperation and on-site marketing to boost credibility for indigenous platforms.
READ THE STORY: Reuters
Chinese APT UNC5174 Deploys SNOWLIGHT and VShell Malware to Target Linux and macOS Systems
Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF): The China-linked cyber threat group UNC5174 has resurfaced with a new campaign targeting Linux systems using a variant of the SNOWLIGHT malware and a remote access trojan (RAT) dubbed VShell. The attackers leverage open-source tools to evade attribution, gain persistence, and exfiltrate sensitive data through stealthy, fileless techniques. The malware has also been observed targeting macOS and shares TTPs with previous campaigns exploiting Ivanti, F5, and ConnectWise vulnerabilities.
Analyst Comments: UNC5174 (aka Uteus/Uetus) exemplifies the evolving Chinese threat landscape, characterized by cost-effective, open-source malware usage, modular payload delivery, and cross-platform targeting. The campaign’s deployment of SNOWLIGHT and VShell highlights the group’s ability to combine stealth and persistence through in-memory execution and WebSocket-based C2 channels. Its use of fake applications—such as a counterfeit Cloudflare authenticator—and recycled infrastructure from publicly known C2 frameworks like SUPERSHELL and Sliver aligns with a trend of operational blending meant to obscure state ties. The reuse of Ivanti and F5 vulnerabilities also reflects the group’s focus on exploiting enterprise software flaws with high availability. Organizations using Linux or macOS systems should prioritize patching exposed infrastructure and implement behavioral monitoring to detect fileless malware execution.
FROM THE MEDIA: The campaign—observed by Sysdig and supported by earlier reports from ANSSI and Mandiant—leverages tools like SUPERSHELL and Sliver for persistence and lateral movement. The infection begins with a bash script deploying binaries for SNOWLIGHT and Sliver, which communicate with C2 servers via WebSockets and execute stealthy payloads in memory. The malware suite is capable of arbitrary command execution, file exfiltration, and gathering device information. SNOWLIGHT and VShell also have macOS variants and have been found embedded in fake authenticator apps. Related activity has exploited vulnerabilities in ConnectWise, Ivanti, and F5 systems, with evidence pointing to UNC5174’s role in global campaigns spanning over 20 countries. The disclosure aligns with broader tensions, as Chinese authorities accuse the U.S. of launching 170,000 cyberattacks against systems during the 2025 Asian Winter Games.
READ THE STORY: THN
Nvidia Withheld China Export License Warning, Risking $18B in AI Chip Orders
Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF): Nvidia failed to inform several major Chinese clients of new U.S. export licensing requirements for its China-specific H20 AI chips, despite being notified by Washington on April 9. The delayed disclosure, made public only on April 16, shocked Chinese cloud providers and threatens billions in sales, while positioning Huawei to benefit from the disruption.
Analyst Comments: Nvidia’s handling of the H20 licensing clampdown underscores the precarious balance U.S. tech firms must maintain under tightening export controls. The delayed communication risks reputational damage in a key market, while the $5.5 billion charge announced by Nvidia reflects the scale of financial exposure tied to U.S.-China geopolitical tensions. Huawei and other Chinese chipmakers now stand to gain as companies like Tencent and Alibaba pivot away from U.S. suppliers. This incident could accelerate China's push for AI self-sufficiency, deepening the technological bifurcation between East and West. For Nvidia, the H20 setback is a warning of increasing regulatory volatility in export-driven segments.
FROM THE MEDIA: Nvidia did not warn key Chinese clients—including Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba—about new U.S. restrictions requiring an export license for its H20 AI chip, despite receiving notice from the U.S. government on April 9. The chipmaker revealed the licensing change publicly only a week later, by which time Chinese customers were still expecting year-end deliveries. The H20, launched after prior U.S. restrictions in October 2023, had generated $18 billion in orders. Nvidia now faces up to $5.5 billion in inventory-related charges as the licensing requirement was deemed indefinite. Analysts suggest that Huawei could capitalize on Nvidia’s constrained access to the Chinese market, with Beijing’s domestic chip ecosystem likely to gain ground due to forced adaptation.
READ THE STORY: Reuters
ASML Chipmaking Orders Fall Short Amid Tariff Turmoil and Market Uncertainty
Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF): ASML reported €3.9 billion in chipmaking equipment orders for Q1 2025—falling short of analyst expectations by nearly €1 billion—amid heightened geopolitical and trade tensions driven by U.S. tariffs. While AI-related demand remains strong, ASML’s leadership cited macroeconomic uncertainty and trade policy volatility as major concerns.
Analyst Comments: Despite robust long-term demand driven by AI and high-performance computing, the looming threat of trade restrictions is clouding short-term procurement strategies. The firm’s unchanged revenue guidance signals underlying confidence in future growth, but investor sentiment may remain shaky unless trade clarity returns. This episode also underscores how exposed the global chip supply chain is to geopolitical instability—especially in an election year.
FROM THE MEDIA: Dutch semiconductor equipment leader ASML revealed that its net bookings for Q1 2025 came in at €3.9 billion, significantly below the €4.8 billion anticipated by analysts. CEO Christophe Fouquet attributed the shortfall in part to recent U.S. tariff announcements under the Trump administration, which have introduced new layers of macroeconomic uncertainty. Though AI continues to drive demand for advanced chips, customers such as TSMC, Intel, and Samsung are reportedly holding back on orders, potentially bracing for future export controls or price volatility. Despite these challenges, ASML's quarterly revenue rose 46% year-on-year to €7.7 billion, and the company maintained its full-year guidance of €30–35 billion in revenue. The company expects 2025 and 2026 to be growth years, but warned of a “dynamic” and uncertain global trade environment.
READ THE STORY: FT
Items of interest
CVE Program Faces Shutdown as U.S. Government Funding Abruptly Ends
Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF): The U.S. government has ended its funding for the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) program, effective April 16, 2025. The decision, part of a broader Trump administration cost-cutting effort, could disrupt global vulnerability management and cybersecurity coordination. MITRE, which manages the program, has confirmed the expiration of its DHS contract, raising concerns across the industry.
Analyst Comments: The CVE system is foundational to modern cybersecurity operations. Without continued support or an immediate alternative, organizations may soon lose access to a centralized and standardized way to track and respond to vulnerabilities. The abrupt nature of the funding cut could cause significant confusion, especially for compliance-driven sectors. Industry leaders warn of a return to pre-CVE chaos unless a consortium or new funding source steps in. While private actors like VulnCheck have preemptively reserved CVE identifiers, this stopgap will only last a month or two. If left unresolved, the void could fracture global vulnerability reporting and impact everything from vendor patching to national infrastructure defense.
FROM THE MEDIA: The program, operated by MITRE under a DHS contract, assigns unique identifiers to software vulnerabilities to aid global coordination in cybersecurity efforts. MITRE confirmed that its funding expires this week, potentially halting future CVE assignments and updates. Cybersecurity experts, including Katie Moussouris and Dustin Childs, warned that without the CVE system, enterprises and governments may face widespread confusion and security blind spots. CVE partners, including VulnCheck, have reserved a limited number of CVEs for short-term continuity, but no long-term solution has yet emerged.
READ THE STORY: The Register
MITRE To Take CVE Database Offline (Video)
FROM THE MEDIA: On April 16, 2025, MITRE’s funding to operate the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) Program and the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Program will officially expire. This marks a major shake-up in the cybersecurity ecosystem, as the CVE database is a critical backbone for vulnerability management, threat research, and global cyber defense efforts.
You Won't Believe What's Happening To MITRE CVE Program (Video)
FROM THE MEDIA: The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) program, operated by MITRE, is facing a significant disruption due to the expiration of its federal funding contract. This program is crucial for assigning unique identifiers to publicly disclosed cybersecurity vulnerabilities, enabling organizations worldwide to track and address security threats effectively. The expiration of MITRE's contract with the U.S. government raises concerns about the continuity of this essential resource.
The selected stories cover a broad array of cyber threats and are intended to aid readers in framing key publicly discussed threats and overall situational awareness. InfoDom Securities does not endorse any third-party claims made in its original material or related links on its sites; the opinions expressed by third parties are theirs alone. For further questions, please contact InfoDom Securities at dominanceinformation@gmail.com.